Journal of Ai ML DL
Journal of Ai ML DL | Online ISSN 3070-2143
0
Citations
29.1k
Views
18
Articles
Volume 2 Number 1 2026
REVIEWS (Open Access)
Global AI Governance in Comparison: Ethics, Regulation, and Accountability Across OECD, UNESCO, EU, and US Frameworks
Md Wasim Ahmed1*
Journal of Ai ML DL 2 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/ai.2110840
Submitted: 11 November 2025 Revised: 09 January 2026 Accepted: 15 January 2026 Published: 17 January 2026
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence now sits at the center of decision-making in healthcare, finance, education, and public administration — and with that reach has come a harder question: who, exactly, is answerable when these systems get it wrong? Concerns over bias, opacity, and unchecked data use have pushed AI governance from a niche policy interest into something closer to a global necessity (Wirtz et al., 2022).
Methods: This review takes a qualitative, comparative approach to four influential governance instruments — the OECD AI Principles, UNESCO's Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2021), the EU AI Act, and the US NIST AI Risk Management Framework. Secondary sources, drawn from peer-reviewed journals, institutional reports, and policy documents, were synthesized around a conceptual framework built on six recurring governance dimensions: policy and regulation, stakeholder involvement, monitoring and compliance, risk management, transparency and accountability, and ethical principles.
Results: The comparison surfaces a governance landscape that is more fragmented than unified. The EU leans on binding, risk-tiered law; the US favors voluntary, innovation-first guidance; OECD and UNESCO offer shared ethical scaffolding without enforcement teeth. Transparency, accountability, and fairness recur across all four, but harmonization, algorithmic bias, and enforcement gaps remain largely unresolved.
Conclusion: No single framework, on its own, is equipped to govern AI responsibly at global scale. What emerges instead is a case for deliberate integration — ethical commitments, legal instruments, and technical safeguards working together rather than in parallel — if AI is to be trusted across the very different regulatory cultures it now operates within.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Governance; Responsible AI Regulation; AI Ethics and Accountability; Algorithmic Transparency; Comparative Policy Analysis
References
Akinola, O., Tunbosun, O. A., & Oladapo, B. (2022). Comparative analysis regulatory of AI and algorithm in UK, EU and USA. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4212588
Birchfield, V. L., Roy, V., & Sreedhar, V. (2022). The EU's potential to lead in "ethical and secure" artificial intelligence: Last, best hope? Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 20(3–4), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42738-023-00101-3
Coglianese, C., & Ben Dor, L. (2019). AI in adjudication and administration: A status report on governmental use of algorithmic tools in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501067
de Almeida, P. G. R., dos Santos, C. D., & Farias, J. S. (2021). Artificial intelligence regulation: A framework for governance. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09593-z
Ebers, M. (2021). Regulating explainable AI in the European Union: An overview of the current legal framework(s). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3901732
Ebers, M., Hoch, V. R. S., Rosenkranz, F., Ruschemeier, H., & Steinrötter, B. (2021). The European Commission's proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—A critical assessment by members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS). J, 4(4), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.3390/j4040043
Falco, G., Shneiderman, B., Badger, J., Carrier, R., Dahbura, A., Danks, D., Eling, M., Goodloe, A., Gupta, J., Hart, C., Jirotka, M., Johnson, H., LaPointe, C., Llorens, A. J., Mackworth, A. K., Maple, C., Pálsson, S. E., Pasquale, F., Winfield, A., & Yeong, Z. K. (2021). Governing AI safety through independent audits. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(7), 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00370-7
Fukuda-Parr, S., & Gibbons, E. (2021). Emerging consensus on 'ethical AI': Human rights critique of stakeholder guidelines. Global Policy, 12(S6), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12965
Giansanti, D. (2022). The regulation of artificial intelligence in digital radiology in the scientific literature: A narrative review of reviews. Healthcare, 10(10), 1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101824
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Understanding artificial intelligence adoption in operations management: Insights from the review of academic literature and social media discussions. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1–2), 177–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03683-9
Gwagwa, A., Kazim, E., Kachidza, P., Hilliard, A., Siminyu, K., Smith, M., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2021). Road map for research on responsible artificial intelligence for development (AI4D) in African countries: The case study of agriculture. Patterns, 2(12), 100381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100381
Hacker, P. (2021). A legal framework for AI training data—from first principles to the Artificial Intelligence Act. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1977219
Hickman, E., & Petrin, M. (2021). Trustworthy AI and corporate governance: The EU's ethics guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence from a company law perspective. European Business Organization Law Review, 22(4), 593–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00224-0
Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L. S., & Janowski, T. (2020). Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy artificial intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493
Justo-Hanani, R. (2022). The politics of artificial intelligence regulation and governance reform in the European Union. Policy Sciences, 55(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09452-8
Kaack, L. H., Donti, P. L., Strubell, E., Kamiya, G., Creutzig, F., & Rolnick, D. (2022). Aligning artificial intelligence with climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 12(6), 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01377-7
Lütz, F. (2022). Gender equality and artificial intelligence in Europe: Addressing direct and indirect impacts of algorithms on gender-based discrimination. ERA Forum, 23(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00709-6
Mhlanga, D. (2022). Human-centered artificial intelligence: The superlative approach to achieve sustainable development goals in the fourth industrial revolution. Sustainability, 14(13), 7804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137804
Rai, N. (2022). Why ethical audit matters in artificial intelligence? AI and Ethics, 2(1), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00100-0
Raquib, A., Channa, B., Zubair, T., & Qadir, J. (2022). Islamic virtue-based ethics for artificial intelligence. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00028-2
Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Hine, E., Mazzi, F., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). Achieving a 'good AI society': Comparing the aims and progress of the EU and the US. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(6), 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00340-7
Salas-Pilco, S. Z. (2021). Comparison of national artificial intelligence (AI): Strategic policies and priorities. In Artificial intelligence in higher education (pp. 195–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74420-5_9
Stix, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence by any other name: A brief history of the conceptualization of "trustworthy artificial intelligence." Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00041-5
Timan, T., & Mann, Z. (2021). Data protection in the era of artificial intelligence: Trends, existing solutions and recommendations for privacy-preserving technologies. In The elements of big data value (pp. 153–175). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68176-0_7
Truby, J. (2020). Governing artificial intelligence to benefit the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 946–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2048
UNESCO. (n.d.). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence: UNESCO's first-ever global standard on AI ethics. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence
Varošanec, I. (2022). On the path to the future: Mapping the notion of transparency in the EU regulatory framework for AI. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 36(2), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2022.2060471
Wang, C., Zhang, J., Lassi, N., & Zhang, X. (2022). Privacy protection in using artificial intelligence for healthcare: Chinese regulation in comparative perspective. Healthcare, 10(10), 1878. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101878
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Kehl, I. (2022). Governance of artificial intelligence: A risk and guideline-based integrative framework. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101685
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Sturm, B. J. (2020). The dark sides of artificial intelligence: An integrated AI governance framework for public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(9), 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1749851
Xue, L., & Pang, Z. (2022). Ethical governance of artificial intelligence: An integrated analytical framework. Journal of Digital Economy, 1(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2022.08.003
Yeung, K. (2020). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD). International Legal Materials, 59(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2020.5