Microbial Bioactives

Microbial Bioactives | Online ISSN 2209-2161
402
Citations
330.3k
Views
191
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
REVIEWS   (Open Access)

Maryam Zafar 1*, Faiz un-Nisa 2, Bheesham Kingrani 3, Nafi Khan Rhine 4, Khurshed Alam 4

+ Author Affiliations

Microbial Bioactives 9 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/microbbioacts.9110932

Submitted: 26 July 2026 Revised: 18 September 2026  Accepted: 27 September 2026  Published: 29 September 2026 


Abstract

Broad-spectrum antibiotics remain the default response to enteric dysbiosis and opportunistic pathobionts such as Clostridioides difficile, yet their collateral destru Opri?anuction of protective commensals perpetuates a cycle of relapse and antimicrobial resistance. Over the past decade, the field has begun to move away from this blunt eradication logic toward something more deliberate: microbial therapeutics that are designed, rather than merely selected, to restore ecological order. This shift, admittedly still uneven across laboratories and regulatory systems, forms the starting point of the present review. We conducted a structured, narrative synthesis of the peer-reviewed literature indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2005–2026), supplemented by manual reference-list screening. Sixty-plus primary and secondary sources were retained for qualitative synthesis. Across these, a coherent picture emerges: colonization resistance against C. difficile depends on maintaining secondary bile acids and short-chain fatty acids within defined, non-cytotoxic concentration bands, and on precision-guided quorum-quenching circuits that avoid collapsing beneficial cross-feeding networks. Engineered chassis—principally Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, Lactococcus lactis, Saccharomyces boulardii, and spore-forming Bacillus species—have progressed from proof-of-concept constructs to Phase I–III clinical evaluation across phenylketonuria, inflammatory bowel disease, and recurrent C. difficile infection, aided by CRISPR-Cas9 chromosomal integration, base editing in obligate anaerobes, CRISPR interference, and layered biocontainment (synthetic auxotrophy, kill switches, prebiotic-dependent niche control). Engineered probiotics and rationally assembled synthetic consortia constitute a maturing, mechanistically grounded therapeutic class rather than an incremental refinement of traditional supplementation. Their translation now hinges less on proof of biological concept and more on genetic stability under host selective pressure, harmonized regulatory pathways, and scalable good manufacturing practice—challenges that are addressed throughout this review.

Keywords: Engineered probiotics; synthetic microbial consortia; live biotherapeutic products; CRISPR-Cas9; quorum quenching; short-chain fatty acids; Clostridioides difficile

References

Abouelela, M. E., & Helmy, Y. A. (2024). Next-generation probiotics as novel therapeutics for improving human health: Current trends and future perspectives. Microorganisms, 12(3), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030430

Chen, K., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Hamza, T., Yu, H., Saint Fleur, A., Galen, J., Yang, Z., & Feng, H. (2020). A probiotic yeast-based immunotherapy against Clostridioides difficile infection. Science Translational Medicine, 12(567), eaax4905. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aax4905

Depardieu, F., & Bikard, D. (2020). Gene silencing with CRISPRi in bacteria and optimization of dCas9 expression levels. Methods, 172, 1283–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.07.024

Dey, P. (2026). Genetic and metabolic engineering techniques for gut microbial strain improvement. Gut Microbiome and Health, 1, 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmh.2026.100003

Drolia, R., Teng, H., & Biswas, D. (2020). Recombinant Lactobacillus paracasei expressing Listeria adhesion protein (LAP) controls Listeria monocytogenes infection. Gut Microbes, 11(5), 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2020.1722681

Duhan, P., Gupta, B., Ahmed, M., & Bansal, P. (2025). Gut microbiome engineering with probiotics: Current trends and future directions. Discover Applied Sciences, 7, 1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07622-w

Hussain, A., Ilyas, R., Tasleem, S., Mojgani, N., Shah, S. E., & Ali, S. A. (2026). Integrated probiotic, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence-based strategies for the management of multidrug-resistant pathogens: A review. Next Nanotechnology, 10, 100685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxtnano.2026.100685

Jo, S. H., Jeon, H. J., Song, W. S., Lee, J. S., Kwon, J. E., Park, J. H., Kim, Y. R., Kim, M. G., Baek, J. H., Kwon, S. Y., Kim, J. S., Yang, Y. H., & Kim, Y. G. (2023). Unveiling the inhibition mechanism of Clostridioides difficile by Bifidobacterium longum via multiomics approach. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1293149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1293149

Kamath, S., Ariaee, A., Abdelhafez, A., Asif, Z., Chan, N. S. L., Collins, K., Hunter, A., & Joyce, P. (2025). Microbiome-active drug delivery systems (MADDS): Leveraging microbial stimuli for controlled drug release. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 227, 115720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2025.115720

Karunakar, K. K., Prabakaran, S., Jayashree, S., Philip, S., & Kataria, K. R. (2026). Microecological control of antimicrobial resistance using CRISPR-based precision interventions. Medicine in Microecology, 28, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2026.100173

Liang, J., & Tan, Y. (2023). Highly efficient CRISPR-mediated base editing for the gut Bacteroides spp. with pnCasBS-CBE. Biotechnology Journal, 18(9), e2200504. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.2200504

Ninyio, N., Schmitt, K., Sergon, G., Nilsson, C., Andersson, S., & Scherbak, N. (2024). Stable expression of HIV-1 MPER extended epitope on the surface of the recombinant probiotic bacteria Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 using CRISPR/Cas9. Microbial Cell Factories, 23, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02290-0

Nogueira, L. M., Meurer, E. C., & Pileggi, M. (2026). Modulation of Clostridioides difficile virulence by metabolites derived from probiotic consortia and genetically edited strains. Biotechnology Advances, 88, 108818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.108818

Opri?anu, M., et al. (2026). Postbiotics functionality and safety evaluation of LAB and spore-forming probiotics. Journal of Functional Foods, 143, 107411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2026.107411

Palmer, J. D., Piattelli, E., McCormick, B. A., Silby, M. W., Brigham, C. J., & Bucci, V. (2018). Engineered probiotic for the inhibition of Salmonella via tetrathionate-induced production of microcin H47. ACS Infectious Diseases, 4(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00114

Patel, N., & Hajoori, M. (2026). Designer probiotics and synbiotics: Engineering the microbiome for precision health. Exploratory Foods and Foodomics, 4, 1010182. https://doi.org/10.37349/eff.2026.1010182

Ridlon, J. M., Kang, D. J., & Hylemon, P. B. (2022). Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. Journal of Lipid Research, 63, 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.TR120001003

Shahid, U. (2025). Microbiome-guided precision medicine: Mechanistic insights, multi-omics integration, and translational horizons. The Journal of Precision Medicine: Health and Disease, 3, 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.premed.2025.100018

Shebl, N. M., & Bebawy, G. (2026). Engineered probiotic platforms: Molecular architectures, disease applications, and state of clinical translation. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Sciences (JAPS), 3(2), 5–27.

Singh, I., Abdulqadir, R., Verma, I. K., Awasthi, Y., Ratn, A., Sharma, J., & Sharma, D. (2025). Engineered probiotics: The next-generation therapeutics to combat antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Food Frontiers, 7(2), e70168. https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.70168

Sorg, J. A., & Sonenshein, A. L. (2008). Bile salts and glycine as cogerminants for Clostridium difficile spores. Journal of Bacteriology, 190, 2505–2512. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01765-07

Sun, C., Zhu, J., Sun, X., Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., Jin, Y., & Wu, T. (2026). Targeting the human gut microbiome: A comparative review of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics. Journal of Advanced Research, 87, 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2025.12.025

Sutanto, H., & Fetarayani, D. (2026). Gut microbiome engineering: Tools, techniques, and clinical translation. Gut Microbiology, 2, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gutmicro.2026.100005

Vital, M., Howe, A. C., & Tiedje, J. M. (2014). Revealing the bacterial butyrate synthesis pathways by analyzing (meta)genomic data. mBio, 5, e00889-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00889-14

Vockley, J., Sondheimer, N., Puurunen, M., Diaz, G., Ginevic, I., Grange, D., et al. (2023). Efficacy and safety of a synthetic biotic for treatment of phenylketonuria: A phase 2 clinical trial. Nature Metabolism, 5, 1841–1850.

Zhao, L., Xin, J., Hu, M., et al. (2026). Programmable microbial therapeutics: Advances in engineered bacteria for targeted in vivo delivery and precision medicine. Journal of Advanced Research, 85, 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2025.10.028


Article metrics
View details
0
Downloads
0
Citations
32
Views

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



0
Save
0
Citation
32
View
0
Share