Integrative Biomedical Research

Integrative Biomedical Research (Journal of Angiotherapy) | Online ISSN  3068-6326
558
Citations
1.1m
Views
724
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
RESEARCH ARTICLE   (Open Access)

Decellularization Agents on Porosity and Pore Size in Bovine Pericardium Scaffolds for Pediatric Heart Surgery

Abstract References

Mario Hendri RW1*, Heroe Soebroto 1, Ito Puruhito 1

+ Author Affiliations

Journal of Angiotherapy 8 (7) 1-6 https://doi.org/10.25163/angiotherapy.879815

Submitted: 03 June 2024 Revised: 21 July 2024  Published: 24 July 2024 


Abstract

Background: Tissue engineering in pediatric and congenital heart surgery relies on developing biomaterials with extracellular matrix (ECM)-like properties. The acellular bovine pericardium membrane (BPM) is a promising scaffold due to its strength, low infection rates, and cost-effectiveness. Decellularization is essential to optimize BPM's properties for tissue regeneration. This study investigates the effects of different decellularization methods on BPM's porosity and pore size. Methods: A true experimental design was used to evaluate BPM scaffolds treated with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or ASB-16, compared to a control group. Porosity and pore size were measured using image analysis software after 4 weeks of incubation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, and one-way ANOVA. Results: ASB-16 decellularization significantly increased BPM porosity (50.14 ± 3.71%) compared to the control (3.06 ± 0.99%) and other treatments (SDS: 6.23 ± 2.94%, H2O2: 4.47 ± 1.34%). Pore size was also significantly larger in the ASB-16 group (26.9 ± 5.93 µm) compared to SDS (8.99 ± 2.77 µm), H2O2 (3.13 ± 1.00 µm), and control (2.00 ± 0.29 µm). Conclusion: ASB-16 decellularization effectively enhances BPM porosity and pore size, making it a promising method for optimizing scaffolds in tissue engineering applications. Further research should focus on its impact on cell proliferation and tissue regeneration.

Keywords: Bovine pericardium membrane, Decellularization, Porosity, Pore size, Tissue engineering

References

Alizadeh, M., Rezakhani, L., khodaei, M., Soleimannejad, M., & Alizadeh, A. (2021). Evaluating the effects of vacuum on the microstructure and biocompatibility of bovine decellularized pericardium. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 15(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/TERM.3150

Alizadeh, M., Rezakhani, L., Soleimannejad, M., Sharifi, E., Anjomshoa, M., & Alizadeh, A. (2019). Evaluation of vacuum washing in the removal of SDS from decellularized bovine pericardium: method and device description. Heliyon, 5(8), e02253. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2019.E02253

Annabi, N., Nichol, J. W., Zhong, X., Ji, C., Koshy, S., Khademhosseini, A., & Dehghani, F. (2010). Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews, 16(4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1089/TEN.TEB.2009.0639

Dalgliesh, A. J., Parvizi, M., Lopera-Higuita, M., Shklover, J., & Griffiths, L. G. (2018). Graft-specific immune tolerance is determined by residual antigenicity of xenogeneic extracellular matrix scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia, 79, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2018.08.016

Khademhosseini, A., & Langer, R. (2007). Microengineered hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 28(34), 5087–5092. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2007.07.021

Lam, M. T., & Wu, J. C. (2012). Biomaterial applications in cardiovascular tissue repair and regeneration. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 10(8), 1039. https://doi.org/10.1586/ERC.12.99

Liao, M., Liu, Z., Bao, J., Zhao, Z., Hu, J., Feng, X., Feng, R., Lu, Q., Mei, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, Q., & Jing, Z. (2008). A proteomic study of the aortic media in human thoracic aortic dissection: Implication for oxidative stress. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 136(1), 65-72.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTCVS.2007.11.017

Limpert, J. N., Desai, A. R., Kumpf, A. L., Fallucco, M. A., & Aridge, D. L. (2009). Repair of abdominal wall defects with bovine pericardium. American Journal of Surgery, 198(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2009.01.027

Sanzana, E. S., Navarro, M., Ginebra, M. P., Planell, J. A., Ojeda, A. C., & Montecinos, H. A. (2014). Role of porosity and pore architecture in the in vivo bone regeneration capacity of biodegradable glass scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 102(6), 1767–1773. https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.A.34845


Article metrics
View details
12
Downloads
0
Citations
1362
Views
📖 Cite article

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



12
Save
0
Citation
1362
View
0
Share