Energy Environment and Economy
Environmental & Ecological Protection in Philosophical Pathways: A Critical Review of Ethics-Led Environmentalism
Md. Anwar Hossain 1*, Partho Protim Bhattacharya 1, Kanij Ruksana 2
Energy Environment and Economy 4 (1) 1-19 https://doi.org/10.25163/energy.4110781
Submitted: 10 June 2026 Revised: 13 August 2026 Accepted: 14 August 2026 Published: 14 August 2026
Abstract
Environmental degradation is often discussed as a technical challenge—one that can be solved through better technologies, stricter regulations, or more efficient resource management. Yet despite decades of scientific advances and policy interventions, ecological decline continues to accelerate. This persistent gap raises an uncomfortable but increasingly unavoidable question: are environmental crises fundamentally ethical problems as much as technical ones? This review explores the philosophical foundations of ethics-led environmentalism and examines how moral reasoning can contribute to more durable forms of ecological governance. Drawing upon scholarship in environmental ethics, environmental justice, ecological philosophy, sustainability studies, and environmental law, the review synthesizes diverse perspectives including ecocentrism, biocentrism, stewardship ethics, intergenerational justice, Earth Jurisprudence, and culturally grounded traditions such as Dharma, Ubuntu, and the Chinese philosophy of human–nature harmony. The analysis further evaluates distributive, procedural, and recognition-based dimensions of environmental justice and investigates illustrative cases from Europe, North America, India, and China. Across these contexts, a recurring pattern emerges: environmental initiatives tend to achieve greater legitimacy and longevity when ethical commitments are translated into institutional practice. The review also considers economic, political, and cultural barriers that complicate the implementation of ethics-led approaches. Ultimately, it argues that environmental protection cannot rely solely on technical expertise and regulatory containment. A genuinely sustainable future requires ecological governance grounded in moral responsibility, social justice, and a renewed understanding of humanity’s relationship with the natural world.
Keywords: Environmental Ethics, Ecological Governance, Environmental Justice, Ecocentrism, Intergenerational Justice, Sustainability, Earth Jurisprudence
References
Alba, R., Klepp, S., & Bruns, A. (2020). Environmental justice and the politics of climate change adaptation – the case of Venice. Geographica Helvetica, 75, 363–368. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-363-2020
Barga, T. (2021). African ecological theology: Pedagogical pathways to environmental protection. AKU: An African Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(1), 3–19.
Begum, A., Liu, J., Qayum, H., & Mamdouh, A. (2022). Environmental and moral education for effective environmentalism: An ideological and philosophical approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315549
Cryer, P., Proches, S., & Druce, D. J. (2024). The shifting philosophy behind the protected area concept and its applicability in the South African context. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 5, 1497920. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2024.1497920
Cui, S. (2024). Evaluation on the ecological philosophy of traditional Chinese agriculture and rural sustainable development. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia da Unesp, 47(5), e02400253.
De Lucia, V. (2013). Towards an ecological philosophy of law: A comparative discussion. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 4(2), 167–190.
Kretz, L. (2013). Hope in environmental philosophy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26, 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9425-8
Li, X. (2025). Pathways to achieving sustainable development and green governance in Chinese corporate law. Sustainable Development, 33(5).
Mathews, F. (2014). Environmental philosophy. In N. N. Trakakis & G. Oppy (Eds.), A history of Australasian philosophy (pp. 543–591). Springer.
Mohai, P., Pellow, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 405–430.
Okereke, C., & Charlesworth, M. (2014). Environmental and ecological justice. In M. M. Betsill, K. Hochstetler, & D. Stevis (Eds.), Advances in international environmental politics (2nd ed., pp. 123–147). Palgrave Macmillan.
Pratihar, A. R., & Roy, A. (2025). Indian philosophical pathways to eco wisdom and sustainable development. International Journal of Social Science Research (IJSSR), 2(4), 544–555.
Resnik, D. B. (2022). Environmental justice and climate change policies. Bioethics, 36(7), 735–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13042
Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. B. (2014). From environmental to climate justice: Climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. WIREs Climate Change, 5(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.275
Stojanovic, M. (2019). Conceptualization of ecological management: Practice, frameworks and philosophy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09783-2
Suter, G. W., II, Norton, S. B., & Cormier, S. M. (2010). The science and philosophy of a method for assessing environmental causes. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 16(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030903459254
Tan, W. K. (2022). Pathway to sustainability through pragmatic wisdom. Philosophies, 7(6), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7060131
Tyburski, W. (2008). Origin and development of ecological philosophy and environmental ethics and their impact on the idea of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 16, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.342
Walker, G. (2012). Environmental justice: Concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge.
Wallace, M. G., Cortner, H. J., Moote, M. A., & Burke, S. (1996). Moving toward ecosystem management: Examining a change in philosophy for resource management. Journal of Political Ecology, 3, 1–36.
Wang, H. (2017). Philosophical connotations, generating logic and construction paths of ecological civilization in a global view. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 29, 592–599.
Zebek, E., Augustyniak, M., & Kowalczyk, M. (2021). An interdisciplinary approach to environmental protection: Legal, economic, technological, and philosophical considerations. Journal of Modern Science, 2(47), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/142750
Zhang, J., Ma, M., Qian, J., & Ma, L. (2025). China’s rural industrial integration under the “Triple Synergy of Production, Livelihood and Ecology” philosophy: Internal mechanisms, level measurement, and sustainable development paths. Sustainability, 17, 8972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17208972
Ziser, M., & Sze, J. (2007). Climate change, environmental aesthetics, and global environmental justice cultural studies. Discourse, 29(2), 384–410.